
This is the front page of our current issue. You can read all the main
articles from the print edition on the website, or download a free PDF
version of the paper. You can also search our archives for articles from
previous issues.
|
|
|
 They only want the best for their country: Assad supporter in Damascus (left), regime opponent outside the Syrian embassy in London.
Regime change in Syria would have unforeseeable consequences – By Michael Lüders
The Syrian leadership’s treatment of its own people is inhumane and
playing havoc with the economic and social foundations of the country.
Nevertheless, President Bashar al-Assad retains a relatively firm grip
on power.
This is primarily because neither Russia nor China will allow the
Damascus regime to collapse. Next to Iran, Syria is their most important
ally in the region. It would not be opportune for Moscow and Beijing if
the West, and in particular the USA and Israel, consolidated their
dominant position in the Middle East. Assad knows this, and that
knowledge is keeping him in power. The second reason Assad remains in
power is the complexity of his country.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Big investors are crowding into agriculture and land – By Wolfgang Mulke
It was a small but heartening victory for Foodwatch, a German
consumer advocacy group, in its fight against speculation on
agricultural commodities. In April, the Deka investment fund unit of
Germany’s state-affiliated banks announced it was pulling out of the
controversial segment. “We have decided to stop listing the price
development of basic foodstuffs such as wheat, soy and livestock,”
Deka’s statement said.
Earlier, Deutsche Bank likewise yielded to public pressure. Germany’s
biggest bank said it would reevaluate its activities in the sensitive
trade of food and refrain from opening any new funds that include
agricultural investments during that time.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
 Germans have not forgotten the past, but some of them find dealing with it difficult: Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in central Berlin.
The debate over Günter Grass’ poem again lays bare Germans’ troubled relationship with Israel, Jews and their own history – By Peter H. Koepf
He wanted to remain silent no longer, he wrote, and that he was weary of
the “West’s hypocrisy.” Germany, itself burdened by history, could not
be permitted to become a “subcontractor for a crime.” Thus spoke Günter
Grass. The nuclear arms power Israel threatens world peace and wants to
exterminate the Iranian nation. Because Germany is to deliver another
submarine to an Israel “specialized in directing all-obliterating
warheads toward an area in which not a single atom bomb has been proven
to exist,” the Nobel Literature laureate (The Tin Drum) felt compelled
to say “what must be said.”
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|